I. >> H
uman Rights and Indicators: Rationale and Some Concerns
>> Human rights indicators - notion and rationale
Although not part of the United Nations, regional
and national human rights systems are key instruments for the protection and promotion of human
rights at country level. There are several regional
intergovernmental organizations that have set
human rights standards and established monitoring
mechanisms. National human rights institutions
(NHRIs) are national bodies established for the
protection and promotion of human rights. There
are many types of NHRIs. The United Nations
adopted the so-called Paris Principles to guide
their work. The Paris Principles also form the
basis for their accreditation by the International
Coordinating Committee of National Institutions,15
for which OHCHR also serves as the secretariat.
C. Human rights indicators - notion and rationale
In the context of this work, a human rights indicator
is specific information on the state or condition of
an object, event, activity or outcome that can be
related to human rights norms and standards; that
addresses and reflects human rights principles
and concerns; and that can be used to assess and
monitor the promotion and implementation of
human rights. Defined in this manner, some indicators could be unique to human rights because they
owe their existence to specific human rights norms or
standards and are generally not used in other
contexts. This could be the case, for instance, with
an indicator like the number of extrajudicial,
summary or arbitrary executions, or the reported
number of victims of torture by the police and the
paramilitary forces, or the number of children who
do not have access to primary education because
of discrimination by the authorities. At the same time,
there could be a large number of other indicators,
such as commonly used socioeconomic statistics
(e.g., human development indicators used in the
Human Development Reports of the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP)), that could meet
(at least implicitly) all the definitional requirements of
a human rights indicator as laid out here. In all these
cases it is helpful to consider them as human rights
indicators, to the extent that they relate to human
rights standards and principles and could be used
for human rights assessments.16
Such a broad understanding of the term indicator
allows it to assume various forms, of a qualitative or
a quantitative nature. This, in turn, may lead to plurality in the understanding of the concept and methodologies to identify and develop indicators, which
can sometimes be a source of confusion. It becomes
necessary, therefore, to have a minimum common
understanding of the types of indicators that are the
focus of this Guide.
1
Quantitative and
qualitative indicators
Indicators can be quantitative or qualitative.
The former are narrowly viewed as equivalent to
“statistics”, while the latter cover any information
articulated as a narrative or in a “categorical” form.
Unless otherwise specified, the term “quantitative
indicator” is used in this publication to designate
15. Further information on the Paris Principles is provided in annex I (indicator 5) and http://nhri.ohchr.org.
16. The conceptual, methodological and operational criteria relevant to the identification and use of indicators for human rights
implementation and assessment are outlined in the different chapters of this Guide. These criteria contribute to clarifying further the
distinction between common indicators or statistics and “human rights indicators”.
16 Human Rights Indicators